Fire Your Campaign Manager

If you’re a candidate or campaign team ready to hire a campaign manager…or you’ve already hired one please take note:

If the first thing your Campaign Manager tells you to do is to get on Facebook and Twitter…show him/her the door.

Sounds odd coming from we tech centric uber geeks who live inside the Matrix eh?  Not really.  Here’s why.  Although Twitter and Facebook are obviously KEY tools in the overall campaign arsenal…they are merely part of a multivariate marketing equation that will drive you to victory.

When a campaign manager is obssessed with Twitter and Facebook first without having an overall content / web strategy…that means there are serious gaps in their approach.  Okay, maybe you don’t have to fire him/her…but absolutely call us and we’ll do a 2 day immersion camp that will blow their minds.   It will be a good save for you campaign manager and the best thing for your candidate.

Iowa Caucus Recap – Technology Dilemma

I attended the Iowa Caucus yesterday and learned quite a bit about the process. See an off year caucus is designed to elect leadership and fill county volunteer positions on committees, to elect delegates, etc. I am now a delegate for my precinct and feel that much more connected to our great process. But here’s something I ran up against in my precinct huddle.

The group was vigorously discussing how we need to get sons and daughters engaged. We have so many voting age college students/high school seniors that are seemingly ignored by most candidates/officials. Ask Chris Hagenow how important even 80 little votes can be to winning a seat? What if those 80…or 200 or 1000 were between 18-24? There were great ideas but it wasn’t until the very end where someone mentioned “That twitter that all the young people are on”.  I don’t expect Citizen USA to know demographic data on these tools…but she was headed in the right direction.

I sat back trying to assess where this group was regarding technology and I chimed in, “Does anyone here NOT have email and is anyone unwilling to provide it as a method of organization?” (silence).  So we had our 100% possible compliance technology.  So I raced home, built a WordPress site, set up an email list on Aweber’s email marketing platform and bought an easy to remember URL.  After all that, I had a moment of reflection, dropped what I was doing…and created a Facebook Group. The thought was “Keep it simple stupid”.

I’m sure we’ll end up doing what campaigns and candidates should do..and that’s to be where people ARE and communicate in the ways THEY want.  Is that more work? YES.  Does it require more infrastructure? YES.  But can one tie them all together to provide a “web” or network of information that “disperses to all of the content outposts” for a campaign automatically? You bet.

We’ll see how this plays out and I will report on a regular basis….but now that I’m in the trenches of my actual neighborhood, I’m going to learn a lot more about what works, what doesn’t, and what we can pass onto other precincts.

More to come.

eCampaign Support via Facebook Fandom

I read this article earlier that made me chuckle.  Long story short, in Canada, there is apparently a looming Teachers’ Strike.  So students from 11 Ontario Colleges planned a walkout at the same time in protest of this strike.  So what did they do?  They had a Facebook Fan Page, DUH!

So on this Facebook Fan Page they gained 22,000 fans.  Quite a number.  They than had  petition, likely distributed through Facebook, that had 4,000 signatures.  Of all these numbers, only 356 students agreed to the walkout.  So the time arrives to walkout and protest and what happens?  (Do you hear the chirping birds?)  Nothing happened. The National Post’s Kelly McParland reported  that,

“Graeme McNaughton, founder of the antistrike Facebook group, said he had found volunteers at 11 colleges who were willing to lead student walkouts. In the end, however, turnout was meagre, and in no case exceeded 20 people.”

Maybe it’s just me, but I find this incredibly funny.  Here you have “activist” college students trying to fight a cause and get incredible online support.  In reality though, only 18% of their fans were willing to sign a petition, 1.618% agreed to walkout and assuming the maximum quoted above (20 per location)  a whopping 1.09% actually did anything.  The National Post reported that one school had a whole student (yes, singular, it’s not a typo) walk out and deliver the petition to the admin offices.  HA!

Lesson?  Just because you have a lot of fans means nothing.  I was actually reading from The Iowa Republican and the Bleeding Heartland and saw a comment by the same commenter that was bleeding with ignorance.  He/She concluded that because one candidate had quadruple the numbers of anyone else running that he would win.  The funniest thing is that he can’t add because one of the other candidates had twice as many as his beloved candidate.

When you’re running your campaign there are two things: Don’t think you lack support because you only have few fans on Facebook and don’t think you’ve got it in the bag because you have a gazillion fans.  In a lot of cases you’d be better off having 20,000 gremlins become fans than having 20,000 actual fans.  (Because gremlins are sneaky, just don’t put them in the microwave;)

So what’s the point of being a fan?  Engagement.  You need to engage.  If I have 100 fans that I am constantly engaging versus someone with 10,000 fans they never engage, I am better off and have a stronger following.  It’s not about fandom, it’s about engagement.  So as you run your online eCampaig remember that even if you rise to the elite of Facebook Fandom, if it’s only based on quantity, not quality, you’re support is utterly worthless.

The Ambiguous Donation

I was reading some blogs today and came across a great article from Hotair.com about the Massachusetts US Senate race between Democratic Attorney General Martha Coakley who is only leading Republican State Senator Scott Brown by a mere 11 points.  Which for Massachusetts, a state where Obama won by 23 points, is pretty darn good considering there are still ten campaigning months left.  In the post the author placed an appeal to donate to Brown’s campaign.  An appeal I’d second as that would be a huge win for us.  But that’s not my point.

Directly below, I was perusing the comments to this post.  Sure enough the second one said,

“I fanned him on Facebook. That’s like a contribution right?”

With the emergence of Social Media (SM) the definition of a donation seems to be skewed.  I’ve noticed this with other campaigns as well.  People are beginning to remove the $$ from the definition of “Campaign Donation” and replacing it with any action from volunteering to “fanning” them on Facebook.  This in fact, is wrong!

Fund raising is key for any campaign, DUH!  Yes, volunteering your time is good, but let’s be honest, I can reach a heck of a lot more people through a TV ad or even a tweet than I will from you knocking on five blocks of homes.  Not only that, but they are less intrusive as well.  Don’t get me wrong.  Volunteering is vital for a successful campaign but it doesn’t mean you don’t have to donate.  That said, you as a candidate should not expect them to not donate because they are volunteering.

It’s simple marketing.  You need to ALWAYS be asking people for donations until they’ve given you the maximum funding the law allows.  Remind them at every turn.  Money may not be the exclusive force that wins campaigns but I promise, it sure does help.

As a campaign you need to be strategizing all the time on how you can generate more funds through your daily actions.  How can you remind people all the time without looking like a loser?  It varies from area to area so figure it out.  Our clients are finding success in different ways and with SM you have many more avenues for generating those funds.

Like I said, don’t let your supporters get away with thinking that fanning your Facebook page is sufficient.  If they want real change than they MUST donate.  Even if it’s just a dollar.  I don’t care how much.  Obviously the more the merrier but anything and everything helps.

Diminished Importance of Mainstream Media

(By John Burnley, Contributing Author to ORS)

Last time I discussed the importance of constituent engagement and how technological tools were beginning to transform the political campaign process. However, I also issued some warnings about utilizing these tools without purpose, strategy or gauging effectiveness. Whether social/new media tools like Facebook or other software, voice or video offerings etc. are implemented, mimicking other campaigns in their use of technology may not produce the desired results. Nevertheless, online campaign initiatives are beginning to take hold. There are more examples surfacing of candidates realizing the importance and relevance of embracing newer approaches to reach constituents, whether to pass information, solicit donations or promote volunteerism.

We are also seeing a shift in the way information is being delivered to the public. I recently ran across another example of social media being used to distribute political technology related content. According to the Facebook page “California governor’s race travels the information superhighway”, the Golden State’s 2010 gubernatorial race may be the most technologically based contest yet to be seen by the state. Candidates have been using Twitter, YouTube videos, Google search advertisements and other social media and online tools. One candidate even made his campaign official via Twitter.

The page also questions if alternate methods of information delivery will diminish the importance of traditional media such as radio and television. YouTube videos, as well as other online or social content delivery mechanisms can be used to respond more quickly to events than traditional media as well as go on the offensive against an opponent. While I’m not intrigued by a new wave of negative candidate bashing YouTube videos, this does allow a candidate the opportunity to respond quickly to comments, inaccurate claims etc. without the possibility of the content being edited or diluted down by traditional media or fighting to have the information delivered to the public at all.

There is no hint about any of the underlying strategies for tool utilization or determining effectiveness, but it does illustrate how campaigns are becoming more innovative in their attempts to reach constituents.

As with most political venues, funding for information and technology for the various candidates is across the board ranging from $17,000 – $900,000. In an economy where many grassroots candidates may struggle for financing, these numbers illustrate the importance that some high profile campaigns are placing on newer methods for constituent engagement. Seriously, Doug, raise your rates for ORS!

Drive Campaign Sales!

Today I joined Doug for the Red Alert Hour and we discussed a few things I really want to extrapolate on.  It really is amazing how few people get it.  Not just in politics but even in business.  People assume that because it’s called social media it is meant to be only ’social.’  They think that these online communication venues are only meant for interaction.  Why is it that communication within the world of social media is constrained to be defined strictly as ‘friendly interaction?’ Are television ads not communication?  Are radio ads not communication?  Heck, are newspaper ads not communication?

I bring this up for a very good reason.  You see….political AND many social media consultants aren’t saying that selling (fund-raising) through social media is pointless.  Rather, they are saying DON’T DO IT!  They say it’s against all that social media stands for.  They say it’s not authentic.  This REALLY erks me.  Let me share why.

Social media STILL follows all the basic marketing principles.  How does my tweeting back and forth with you about the weather going to make you give me your hard earned cash?  IT DOESN’T! It does make you think I’m a nice guy to chat with, but that’s it.  I’m not just saying this – I’ve experienced this with past clients.  You need a call to action. You need to tell them why you are online.  If you are on Facebook and Twitter just to chat…more power to you.  But don’t complain when your sales aren’t going up or you haven’t hit the level of funds you need for your campaign.

Social media IS selling. It’s selling yourself.  It’s selling products.  It’s selling services.  It’s selling oppportunities.  It’s selling and selling and selling and selling.  Get the point?  The argument they always give me is that you need to brand.  Yeah.  So what?  You tell me what good branding is if you aren’t going to sell what you have to offer.  Wait.  You don’t have to because I already know it’s useless.

So get ready, here’s what it takes.  Branding and selling need to be simultaneous acts through social media. You have mere seconds to position yourself, peak interest, coerce a click and motivate your viewer with a call to action. That’s right.  In a matter of seconds.  It’s shorter than TV and radio.  This is done through content generation.  Provide your viewers with valuable content and ALWAYS remind them to donate funds to your campaign.  There are some strategies we use at OperationRedState and of course you’ll have to sign up to find out what .  But it really does come down to the fact that if you are ONLY conversing with your following don’t expect anything to happen.

People don’t vote for friends.  They vote for leaders.  They vote for people they know will stand up for what their constituents believe in.  They vote for people that communicate with them and ask for their help, both monetary and through actions.

You aren’t online to be their friend and frankly, I don’t want to be your friend.  If you are then that’s all you’ll ever be – the friend that keeps running for office but seldom wins.  You are online to lead.  Show me your a leader.  I dare you!

Social Media in 2010

I read a great article yesterday from the Harvard Business Blog about Social Media Trends for 2010.  The author, David Armano, talked about six key things to look out for in 2010.

1. “Social media begins to look less social”: He talks about two things here.  First, we are all so used to the “something to do for everyone” sites like Twitter and Facebook that as more niche networks emerge  the exclusivity brings out an image of being less social.  Second, and this one we all can relate to, as more and more people join networks, more and more of us are going to block, unfollow and hide those high school classmates we never spoke to for a reason.
2. “Corporations look to scale”: Very few companies are utilizing social media beyond a person or two in their marketing department.  He cites Best Buy’s “Twelpforce” which “leverages hundreds of employees” who provide customer support via social media.  With the coming of 2010 more and more corporations will be entering the social media era for cost saving measures and greater efficiency in providing customer service.  They are realizing they need to communicate with you the way you want to be communicated with.
3. “Social business becomes serious play”: He mentions a newer networking site, Foursquare, which is an interesting shift in “network models” for these social site.  One thing all social networks suffer from is attrition.  They lose people and it’s often hard to keep users active in the long-run.  We’ve all seen the numbers on Twitter and how long they keep their average user.  Foursquare actually incentivizes their users to stay active with prizes, contests and rewards.  I would not be surprised to see more networks taking this approach to maximize their user activity which, inevitably, increases ad revenue.
4. “Your company will have a social media policy (and it might actually be enforced)”: Keep your eyes out. This past year there have been numerous instances of employees getting fired for posting things on Facebook and other networks.  For protection you will see companies defining what type of online conduct is allowed not just while at work but probably even at home.
5. “Mobile becomes a social media lifeline”: Companies are coming down hard on those that are using social media while on the clock at work.  They are blocking sites like YouTube and Facebook and have consequences that compell employees to avoid participating on networks while at work.  That said, that’s why we have phones.  Every major network, and even many of the smaller ones, have mobile apps for any kind of smart phone.  These mobile apps keep people involved in ways that their employers can’t monitor as easily, thus, being their lifeline to the online world.
6. “Sharing no longer means email”: For years now whenever you would click on the share link it would pop up your email or a submission form to send a message via email.  Now when you click the share button you get a list of a million different networks you can share on.  You can tweet about it, link it on Facebook, bookmark it on Diigo and share it in many more locations.  Seldom do I get an email anymore, but rather, a message through a shared network.  While e-mail is still a growing method of communication it is definitely not always the preferred method of sharing online content.

Social networking didn’t stop changing this year and won’t next.  As more and more people find niches, apps and other methods of communication we will see so much happen in 2010 across the board.

Political Paradigm Transformation

I was reading an article today, yes, from the Huffington Post, by Jose Antonio Vargas, where he discusses the the technological transformation we experience during Obama v. McCain Presidential election. We’ve discussed this time and time again but now that we’re “one year later” we should take a look back at what really did happen.

I think it was my very first blog post on ORS, Purchasing Power of Social Media, where I discussed the impact the Internet had on fund raising.  Donations of $200 or LESS, were 45% of the $744.9 million raised.  6.5 million donations were made online.  Obama’s email list was 13 million addresses.  Obama also overwhelmingly won the sub-30 age group.

Your constituency chooses to be communicated to in different ways.  Some like TV, others like Facebook, some are into Twitter, and some still like yard signs.  Either way, you need to be able to communicate in whichever way THEY prefer.  It’s not a choice, it’s a necessity.

Many candidates assume the Internet is just how they communicate with their constituents.  No.  Did you miss the fact that Obama had 6.5 million online donations?  They averaged $80 and many donated multiple times.  Your job during your candidacy is to raise money!  You need money!  No money means you lose!  Use the Internet to raise money.

One year later, many of his following feels alienated.  They feel like they have been forgotten.  Climate change, immigration, and other issues have fallen by the wayside.  They tweet about it.  They talk about it on Facebook or even My.BarackObama.com.  We cannot over-emphasize that the Internet is not just a tool to get elected.  This is why ORS is, more or less, political career management.  We help you get elected AND represent your constituency.

Technology won’t stop changing which is why this paradigm shift isn’t likely to stop any time soon.  Even since Obama was elected things have changed even more.  Facebook numbers have increased, Twitter demographics have changed, everything keeps on moving and fortunately, if you use it right, it’s moving to your advantage.

It really does come down to this.  Obama almost did it right.  Communicate.  Raise Money.  Manage Your Constituents.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Text Messaging Booms: 80% More Messages Sent In Just 12 Months; 132.5 Billion Texts Sent (huffingtonpost.com)

How to Win A City Council Campaign

Wade Steenhoek knew early on his campaign that he needed to leverage technology but he didn’t know how to do it.  Everyone kept telling him “Get on Twitter and Facebook” and he knew he had to.  But what to do with them?  Wade connected with Operation Red State EARLY in his campaign and it paid BIG dividends.  Listen to Wade tell the story in his own words and thanks for watching, listening, and learning with ORS.

Don’t Let Your Biases and Unwillingness to Change Eliminate Markets

Face it.  You have campaign advisers telling you that you must “Be on Twitter” (what does that mean by the way??).  You have tweens and teens reminding you daily how Facebook is how they communicate.  You have a basic website that does nothing but provide your positions online.  You’re missing the boat.  Or you have made yourself feel better by delegating (Let’s have Bobby to that tech stuff because he’s young and gets it because I don’t have time for that).

But you’ve just committed a violation that you wouldn’t stand for in your own business.  You’ve delegated without setting clear expectations and you don’t know what success looks like.  The net is that you’ve probably just eliminate a key voting block that I really hope you care about…the under 40 crowd.  I know what you’re thinking…”If I have the tech I can reach them.”  Wrong.  Authenticity is key and if you merely appear to have the tools but don’t use them/live them/embrace them as a true medium of communication (vs. a  vote getter)…you’re cooked.

So when you meet someone under 40 (typically) and start to engage them, think twice before handing them a piece of paper.  Perhaps you should hop on your smart phones and become friends on Facebook, maybe follow each other on Twitter, or at ask the person to subscribe to your RSS feed to help them build the picture of who you are as a candidate.  If you don’t know what I’m talking about…get help.  Fast.  You’ve eliminated the voting block that wants you to succeed the most.

If you’d like to hear how to put together a winning online campaign strategy, join me tonight at 5pm Central on the Operation Red State Red Alert Hour heard LIVE! on www.MacsWorldLive.com

Next Page »

• 

• Social Media

  

• Categories

  • Campaign Technology
  • Classes
  • local politics
  • News
  • Online Fund Raising
  • Podcast
  • Red Alert Dossier
  • Red Alert Hour Webcast
  • Red Alert Video Tips
  • Social Media
  • Social Networking Demographics
  • twitter
• Technorati Profile
• NetworkedBlogs

  Blog:

  Operation Red State

  Topics:

  politics, Republican, technology

  Follow my blog

• Welcome to Operation Red State
• 

Copyright © 2008-2009 Operation Red State · Terms & Conditions · Privacy Policy